Xr6 Vs Sv6. By contrast the xr6 is much more compliant and able to absorb the niggling corrugations and sharp road joins that the sv6 is more likely to bounce over. The sv6 s brakes go away sneakily when punting hard and all of a sudden the same level of pedal resistance doesn t equal the same level of retardation.
The sv6 s brakes go away sneakily when punting hard and all of a sudden the same level of pedal resistance doesn t equal the same level of retardation. Ford has given the xr6 a new territory based braking system and it s way more effective than the old performance brake package it used to charge for. Xr6 s firmer suspension minimises nose diving under brakes but is still sloppier than sv6.
Ford has given the xr6 a new territory based braking system and it s way more effective than the old performance brake package it used to charge for.
Ford falcon xr6 there s not much in the way of change to the sv6 s looks the four door sedan that got some minor tweaks including underbody aero treatment for the series ii update. Holden quotes 215g km for the manual sv6 and 216g km for the auto. There is a pay off in body control with more movement about the suspension and a slight floating sensation as softer rebound damping takes extra time to recover from suspension movement. The sv6 s brakes go away sneakily when punting hard and all of a sudden the same level of pedal resistance doesn t equal the same level of retardation.